Friday, March 22, 2013

Fwd: Three Entrepreneurial Clans in Asia Case Study by Crissy Cruz



Three Entrepreneurial Clans in Asia Case Study by Crissy Cruz

The Case Study of the Three Entrepreneurial Clans in Asia featured 3 Family conglomerates from different Southeast Asian countries.

First there was the Raiva Siblings and Spouses of Thailand who had a restaurant and bakery empire. The Raiva's S&P mainly focused on food related enterprises that would support their core business of managing their restaurants and bakeries. For example they ventured into developing the technology of making and distributing frozen food products in order to reduce wastage and extend the shelf life of their food products. S&P had a They also partnered and operated with well-known international food chains and brands such as Pizza Hut, Swensen's in Thailand and Haage-Dazs Ice Cream.

The Second Family featured is Tunku Abdullah and his Royal Brood from Malaysia. Tunku Abdullah enjoyed the advantages of being a royal and had lots of connections that enabled his family to establish Melewar Corporation as one of the biggest conglomerates in Malaysia. Melewar Corporation has diverse interests that range from property development and construction, tourism, transportation, advertising, marketing and public relations, and TV broadcasting.

Finally, the Third family is Indonesia's Ibu Mutiara Djokosoetono and the rest of his clan. Ibu Mutiara Djokosoetono established the Blue Bird group which initially featured transportation services and later expanded to non-transport services like manufacturing of engines and spare parts of their fleet vehicles in order to stretch their supply chain and resorts that are considered as passenger destinations therefore boosting their transport services business.

The Case Study rationalized the actions of these three conglomerates and discussed them according to theories of Multiplication, Subtraction and Division process in managing their businesses.

All conglomerates practiced addition and multiplying their business ventures in various manners. The Raivas have done it in a more focused and concentrated manner that supports their core business of restaurant and bakery operations. The Melewar group had a "shotgun approach" and grabbed every opportunity that seems viable. They classified their businesses into industry groups, Travel and Tourism, Insurance, Manufacturing, Shipping, Security, Property Development, and TV broadcasting.  For the Blue Bird group of Ibu Mutiara Djokosoetono, it can be noted that their businesses don't really have market focus but instead just a common denominator. All enterprises are related to various modes of transportation and anything that supports its operations and possible expansion.

Out of the three conglomerates, the S&P group didn't had to prune much of their collection of enterprises since they have been very conservative in their expansion activities and only choosing to add companies that would be beneficial to their original core business. However, the Melewar group's shotgun approach had le them to encounter some failed ventures in computer manufacturing and agriculture. These two businesses required heavy R&D and complicated production process, In order to recover losses the Melewar group decided to let go of these businesses and further sell their TV broadcasting company.  The Blue Bird group also weeded out their agribusiness which is a far-fetched business concept from their transportation related businesses. This only goes to show the importance of venturing into enterprises that are outside of the organization's core competencies and other strengths.

As a conglomerate ran by families, the different companies had their own styles of management that involved immediate family members.  Expanding the business was done not only to ensure further income and growth for the company but also to make sure there is enough to divide among family members. It provides opportunities for everyone to participate, pass on the legacy and perform specific areas of responsibility.

With all these in mind, which among the three families has exercised the best strategies in expanding their businesses. I admire the Raiva's S&P group in sticking to what they do best and building the foundation of their business empire based on the requirements or what compliments their bakery and restaurant business. This shows an example of good personal mastery. The Melewar and the Blue Bird group took a different route and expanded their business with investments in fields not part of the same market. Not all the risks they took paid off and some enterprises had to be cut. Those failures do not merit a conclusion that Raiva's S&P group made better management decisions. I believe that entrepreneurship is about taking risks. Melewar and the Blue Bird Group grabbed opportunities and made the most out of them.  The failures that they encountered were just bumps on the road and what's important was they knew how to let go of the things that operated below their expectations. Again, this is another example of self-mastery. We learn by knowing ourselves and by the mistakes that we have done.

In the Philippines, it is evident among the big conglomerates made up by the Sy's, Gokongwei's and the Tan's that their interests are all diverse but in a way related to one another. It is not imperative for conglomerate to just stick to one core business as long as they are able to manage well their enterprises and are adding to the over all profitability of the group. Diversification can also protect the company in losing a lot of resources once one of the industries collapses. A diversified conglomerate would give them power and control over more markets. In return, these interests will pay off by opening new doors and opportunities for them to grown as a conglomerate and be one step ahead of competition.


Cardinal Tagle was emotional at the Ateneo graduation today

Philippines,  March 22, 2013

From Inaglist | March 22, 2013

Cardinal Luis Antonio Nokim Tagle was reported to be the Ateneo commencement speaker today (about 3 hours ago)  It was learned that he delivered a moving, extemporaneous speech to the graduates.

Cardinal Tagle is a Jesuit (like Pope Francis) and he graduated with two Summa Cum Laudes at the Loyola Schools.  And he did while teaching fulltime

He took over Cardinal Rosales who retired.  He was no stranger to the workings of Vatican as he worked under Cardinal Ratzinger (fmr Pope Benedict) in Vatican Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith.

Thursday, March 21, 2013

SENTREP Case Analysis – Entrep Families in Asia – Lea Olegario

SENTREP Case Analysis – Entrep Families in Asia – Lea Olegario
Situation
The case is a discussion of how three families in Asia – Thai, Malay, and Indonesian – were able to grow their businesses in different ways. Their approaches on business development were varying but all of them became very successful. It will start with one person or a couple of members in the family coming up with a business. Some of the family members will then join and help out in managing the business/es. Each will have a role and may contribute new business ideas or a development to the original.
Problem
The concern is how to develop the business of the families, manage it, and keep the business in the coming years.
Alternatives
Some strategies that the families have done are
1.       Adding similar businesses and change the shops according to the target market. This is especially true for the Thai family involved in the food business.
2.       Adding complementing businesses to the existing business. This was done by both the Thai and the Indonesian families. The Thai family added ingredient-producing businesses for its bakeshops and restaurants. The Indonesian family added spare parts and other businesses related to automobiles to complement and be able to handle on its own the repair of its fleet.
3.       Adding any other business that may work. This was how the Malaysian family worked. Whatever opportunity came their way, the family would venture in it. They sell then other that they can no longer handle.
4.       Multiplication was done by increasing the number of branches in great amount as in the case of the Thai family. The Indonesian family who owns the Blue Bird fleet multiplied in an even increasing manner.
5.       The management of the businesses was divided in different ways, the Thai family divided according to functions, The Malaysian family divided their businesses according to industry, and the Indonesian family into lines of businesses.
Decision
 Although all families were able to accumulate immense wealth due to their businesses, their ways were different. They were doing the same strategies of growing their businesses but the application and the details vary. Of all three, the Thai family seems to have got it together; there are a lot of branches, complementing businesses, independence of each family member on their own business, and involvement of the entire family in growing the food business.
Action Analysis
The Thai family was able to reach a big market, increase profitability by creating complementing businesses, and even provide each member significant contribution in the business in differing ways like handling Finances, handling restaurants, handling bakeshops, etc. The matriarch was also able to hold things together and the family was able to pass the love for the business to the entire family and to the next generation. They involved the help of professionals but still kept the main control of the business within the family.
The other families have some indications that it may actually not survive the next years or that management of this may no longer be with the family later on. For the Malaysian family, this seems to be very evident as the heirs do not seem to be very interested in the businesses. Also, the businesses are so varied that they cannot really study one in-depth to be able to grow each one and develop it. Hence, they resorted to selling some of their businesses. The rest of the family does not seem to be involved in the business. In the same way, the Indonesian family is facing the same thing in that the children of the matriarch are not very much involved. Another thing is that if all children will get involved, there are limited business lines to divide to the children to divide amongst them such that they will not be stepping on each other’s toes. This has to be addressed by the matriarch or else she will always need to be there to look after the business and the family.
The Thai family was able to get the balance in all these and the members even show great enthusiasm to be involved in the business, which is a great indication that the business may still survive the generations to come.