To be the best, to think of only of the best, to be taught only of the best by the best.
This is the presentation I made as corporate CEO to our staff; we have decided to be the total provider of memorial services: plots, services (funeral services) crematorium, I hope you can get something from this presentation.
I have shared this at slideshare. You can can learn how to do this if you contact me and you allow yourself to be mentored.
A site for recollection and reemphasis of entrepreneurship and sound business practice. A compilation of both theory and practice of business entrepreneurship. The author is both a practicing businessman and former academic
Wednesday, January 21, 2015
Monday, June 30, 2014
Critical thinking on Air Crash Investigation
Rizal Philippines | June 30 2014
I watched the Air Crash Investigation on Otter twin prop on service at Haiti minutes after take off. The KT approach still applies here.
It is a case where the critical thinking applies.
An Otter twin prop plane dived after take off. All of the 19 passengers and crew died.
They had several hypothesis as to why the plane crashed:
1. weight and balancing
2. engine failure
3. failure of flaps to retract.
After sometime they hypothesized, after seeing the plane control cables which abnormally snapped (the others snapped because of the crash) that this was due to cable failure:
Some observation:
1. The cables wore out due to frequent take off landing especially for the elevators;
2. The particular Otter plane did quite a number of take off landing;
3. This Otter used stainless cable which wore out quickly vs carbon steel cables.
4. The Otter were parked near jet planes and were exposed to jet blast because the jet barrier blast were removed. The elevators were in land position further enhancing the wear and tear of cables.
The results:
Because of this tragedy, certain safety standards were promulgated
1. Stricter standards for cable maintenance.
2. Restoration of the jet blast barrier between prop commuter planes and jet planes
I watched the Air Crash Investigation on Otter twin prop on service at Haiti minutes after take off. The KT approach still applies here.
It is a case where the critical thinking applies.
An Otter twin prop plane dived after take off. All of the 19 passengers and crew died.
They had several hypothesis as to why the plane crashed:
1. weight and balancing
2. engine failure
3. failure of flaps to retract.
After sometime they hypothesized, after seeing the plane control cables which abnormally snapped (the others snapped because of the crash) that this was due to cable failure:
Some observation:
1. The cables wore out due to frequent take off landing especially for the elevators;
2. The particular Otter plane did quite a number of take off landing;
3. This Otter used stainless cable which wore out quickly vs carbon steel cables.
4. The Otter were parked near jet planes and were exposed to jet blast because the jet barrier blast were removed. The elevators were in land position further enhancing the wear and tear of cables.
The results:
Because of this tragedy, certain safety standards were promulgated
1. Stricter standards for cable maintenance.
2. Restoration of the jet blast barrier between prop commuter planes and jet planes
Monday, June 23, 2014
Kepner Tregoe Problem Solving Technique Stil lWorks
Rizal Philippines | June 23, 2014
Yesterday, I had the opportunity to watch an air crash investigation at Nat Geo. The episode is about a Air New Zealand Airbus 320 that crashed off the coast of France, on a acceptance (test flight) for no apparent reason. Since it was on acceptance flight, it was supposed to have undergone thorough overhaul checking.
However, the investigation was able to probe/determine the cause of the crash by comparing the normal and the abnormal (what is what is not, where is where is not)
Yesterday, I had the opportunity to watch an air crash investigation at Nat Geo. The episode is about a Air New Zealand Airbus 320 that crashed off the coast of France, on a acceptance (test flight) for no apparent reason. Since it was on acceptance flight, it was supposed to have undergone thorough overhaul checking.
However, the investigation was able to probe/determine the cause of the crash by comparing the normal and the abnormal (what is what is not, where is where is not)
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)