|
SESSION
|
TOPICS
|
OBJECTIVES
|
ACTIVITY
|
SPECIAL
REPORT
|
LECTURE
|
ASSIGNMENT
FOR THE FOLLOWING WEEK
|
|
DAY
1
|
Course
Intro
SELF
MASTERY
|
1.
To know each other better: Prof vs. students
2.
To know course expectation; grading system
1. To emphasize importance of importance
of individual in enterprise creation / execution
|
1. Self introduction “What are my secret
desires”
2.
Walk through course syllabus
3.
Debate “Entrepreneur are Born, made or Accidental”
|
|
1.
About the Professor
2.
Intro to Entrepreneurship
3. Personal Mastery
Please read / see Slide share at blog www.profjorge_entrep_jorge.blogspot.com
|
1.
Class cards
2.
Learning Agreement
3.
Creative Illegal Activity
4.
Micromarket Observation
|
|
DAY
2
|
SELF
MASTERY
OPPORTUNITY
|
1.
To practice innovation in illegal activity
1. Distinguish opportunity with
innovation creativity invention
|
Group
Presentation
New
Illegal activity
Group
presentation
Micromarket
observation of food outlet
Inspirational Video Presentation
|
|
1.
Opportunity Seeking and Screening
|
1.
NU 6 (graded)
2.
Learning to Be Questionaire
3.
Factors paper (2.5%) Factors that I posses/do not posses that qualify me to
be entrepreneur
4.
Group presentation on creative activity 1 & 2
|
|
DAY 3
|
OPPORTUNITY
OPPORTUNITY
|
|
Group
presentation
Creative
Activity 1
Group
presentation
Creative
Activity 2
Case
Analysis:
|
|
1.
Opportunity Seizing
2.
Innovation / Etrepreneurship
3.
Product Design
1.
Micromarket Analysis
2.
Social Networking
Market
Estimate
|
1.
NU 6 (graded)
2.
Group Presentation in PDQ (graded)
3.
Case Analysis (orals) MC II and Lontoc
|
|
DAY
4
|
CASE
ANALYSIS
JEOPARDY
|
1.
To evaluate students of 1st 7 session in new invasive way
2.
To train students critical (Socratic) thinking, Havardians
|
1.
Group Presentation in PDQ (graded)
2.
Jeopardy Quiz
|
|
1.
New Marketing
2.
Blue Ocean
3.
Process Innovation
4.
Business Model Innovation
Please
read / see Slideshare at blog www.profjorge_entrep_jorge.blogspot.com
|
1.
NU 6 (graded)
2.
Write up of group creative activity 3 & 4
3.
Case Analysis
Pranav
and Mico
|
|
DAY
5
|
CASE
ANALYSIS
|
|
1.
Pranav Case Analysis (orals)
2.
Mico Case Analysis (orals)
Group
presentation
Group
Creative Activity 3 & 4
1.
Victoria Court
2.
Abe Meat – International Business Case
3. New process / Profit
|
|
1.
EDS
Marketing
Blue Ocean
Please read / see Slide share at blog www.profjorge_entrep_jorge.blogspot.com
|
1.
NU 6 (graded)
2.
Case Analysis Entrep Families of Asia
|
|
DAY
6
|
MASTERY
OF THE ENTERPRISE
WRITING
A BUSINESS PLAN
|
|
1.
Case Analysis Entrep Families of Asia
|
|
VMOKRAPI
Business
Concept Model
|
1.
NU 6 (graded)
2.
Topic and Outline of Business Plan (graded) (2.5%)
|
|
DAY 7
|
WRITING
A BUSINESS PLAN
|
|
1. Business
Model
|
|
SPATRES
Business
Model
Business
Model
for
21st Century
|
1.
NU 6 (graded)
2.
Submit VMOKRAPI portion of BP (2.5%) (graded)
|
|
DAY
8
|
WRITING
A BUSINESS PLAN
ENTREP
TALK
CLOSING
|
|
1.
Another jeopardy (optional)
2.
Entrep/Designer/Artist Visit Talk
3.
Awarding
4.
Singing “Song for Mary”
|
|
Business
Model Innovation
|
1.
NU 6 (graded)
2.
Submit SPATRES portion of BP (2.5%) (graded)
3. Submit first draft of Business Plan
(graded) 5 points
|
Grading
Rubric
A.
INDIVIDUAL
|
Component
|
Individual
|
Weight
|
|
|
|
|
Comments
|
|
Attendance
|
Individual
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
1
hour late = 1 absence
1
absence = -2 pts.
Max
of 3 absences
|
|
Factors
Paper
|
Individual
|
2.5
|
Completeness
50%
|
30
|
Analysis
20%
|
Relevance
30%
|
Not
Less than 3 pages
|
|
Special
Report
|
Individual
|
10
|
Completeness
50%
|
10
|
Relevance
to Entrepreneurship
20%
|
Presentation
20%
|
Not
more than 20 minutes;
No
hard copy needed
|
|
NU
6
|
Individual
|
10
|
Uniqueness
70%
|
5
|
Practicality
30%
|
|
1
page of new ideas submitted weekly
|
|
Business
Plan
|
Individual
|
25
|
Completeness
70%
|
10
|
Incorporation
of
In
Business Plan
|
Various Learning
(30%)
|
Not
less than 20 pages
NB:
If there is a product sample + 0.5
|
|
Case
Analysis
|
Individual
|
10
|
Critical
Thinking
70%
|
|
Relevance
of
Hypothesis
/
|
recited facts to
Objectives (30%)
|
NB:
If the student hesitates or opts for a written case analysis, he may do so.
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. GROUP
|
|
Individual/
|
|
Content
|
Polish
|
|
DATA/ FACTS/
|
|
|
|
Component
|
Group
|
Weight
|
Relevance
|
Analysis
|
Craftsmanship
|
Creativity
|
Presentation
|
Comments
|
|
Micro
market Analysis
|
Group
|
5
|
20
|
30
|
10
|
20
|
20
|
Soft
copy only
|
|
PDQ
/ EDS
|
Group
|
5
|
20
|
30
|
10
|
20
|
20
|
Hard
copy only
|
|
New
Illegal Activity
|
Group
|
5
|
10
|
30
|
|
40
|
20
|
≤
10 minutes
Video
or acted out
|
|
Entrepreneur
Visit / Talk
|
Group
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
AUTOMATIC
4.0 IF ENTREPRENEUR VISITS THE CLASS
|
|
Other
Group Activities
|
Group
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 %
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9-POINT
SCALE FOR SCORING STUDENT PERFORMANCE
(Marzano,
2004)
|
Score
|
Description
|
|
4.0
|
In addition to Score 3.0 performance, in-depth
inferences and applications that go beyond what was taught.
|
|
3.5
|
In addition to Score 3.0 performance, partial success
at inferences and applications that go beyond what was taught.
|
|
3.0
|
No major errors / omissions regarding any of the
information and/or processes (simple or complex) that were explicitly taught.
|
|
2.5
|
No major errors / omissions regarding the simpler
details and processes, and partial knowledge of the more complex ideas and
processes.
|
|
2.0
|
No major errors / omissions regarding the simpler
details and processes, but major errors / omissions regarding the more
complex ideas and processes.
|
|
1.5
|
Partial understanding of the simpler details and
processes but major errors / omissions regarding the more complex ideas and
processes.
|
|
1.0
|
With help, a partial understanding of some of the
simpler details and processes and some of the more complex ideas and
processes.
|
|
0.5
|
With help, a partial understanding of some of the
simpler details and processes, but not the more complex ideas and processes.
|
|
0.0
|
Even with help, NO understanding or skill
demonstrated.
|
