Our session yesterday, November 4, 2013 - Congrats again to Group 4

AGSB, H de la Costa Campus  |  November 4, 2013

           Isnt it boring that Group 4 always wins?  This time for MC2 case analysis. Congratulations

We had our 4th to the last session yesterday.  We had two main activities:  IV and SR presentations and two case analysis

Albert Abenidos presentation was both inspiring and humorous.  He presented himself as a lady (and he was gorgeous) and as a macho/alpha man in a TV show.  I think he must upload that presentation.  Then he made an SR on social entrepreneurship.  Martin made an SR on CSV.    Gio had an IV presentation.

Then we had two case analyses:   MC2 and Jose Lontoc.

For MC2,  Group 4 again came out the winner.  It looks so boring that they always win.  So no more contest.  While I kept on saying that opportunities should be money/wealth making opportunities, other groups still were vague on what the opportunities where or came out with business that were not related relevant to the expertise of MC2.  I kept repeating the SMART thing.

For Jose Lontoc, there were various points of view:   it was a finance case -  it is question of whether Lontoc can get the loan or not.  Some says he cant get the loan because (he had  bad record -  his other loan was foreclosed?) and that the externals were not clear (the case says that there were limited number of abbatoirs and the daily demand is about 7000 heads of livestock a day).  And that the business was failing? Others remarked that it was about innovation of Lontoc;  other students say it is about the various porftfolio of business

Then we went into risk, value creation/chain of the business and that Lontoc wanted to control the value chain.  The other aspect of value chain would not be making money or failing but as whole the most profitable, the highest value creator prospers.   Then we asked who is the man who sees the whole picture the whole value chain - and it took some coaching/coaxing to say that it is a strategist/visionary who does this.

It is sad to note that there were students:  who did not read the case or did not read well or were guessing. Those who were not here get a failing grade for the cases discussed. And so with those who did not prepare.  It is a 10 point game!

                                      The winner gets my kisses

                                        Group 4 got my kisses

                                  What are the opportunities?  Isip pa, isip pa

 

 Abet as the macho man in his IV presentation;  underneath though....(surprise!)

On the case analysis of Jose Lontoc

Here are my comments on Jose Lontoc case analysis:

l.  Lei Pichay and Daniel Berroya recited well on the case analysis last night;

2.  The case analysis should be like a thread on comments portion of website;  we pick up from the comments of others:   agree or disagree;

3.  Go direct to the facts;  the relevant facts

4.  Have a hypothesis and define the problem;

5.  Support your allegations with facts;   therefore read the case at least 5 times;  do no come unprepared for the case analysis;

6.   Be SMART;  be clear and specific on your statements as "the piggery is losing"  What of the piggery business is losing money?  Why are they losing money?  Be sure the case facts bear this out

7.  Do not go out of the case.  Avoid injecting facts/allegations in the case from the web, your or similar experiences.

8.  Remember relevance;  relations, conclusions, relevant facts.