There was a project/business proposal made last February. We said that we can push through with this if we are able to pass through hurdles: 1. Ok from the LGU legislative body, 2 that the property can be titled so that license to sell can be obtained. We were able to have audience with the Mayor and he verbally approved the project, but the more expensive tedious procedure has yet to come Obtaining the resolution.
As for the title, the agents who were working on the property said they could using the Free Patent way, and getting the waiver from an Estate. (They claim ownership of some 3,000 hectares in this place) However there seems to be a choice between two entities who will give the waiver. No one seems to to really know who will be legit entity to deal with. There are expenses to be incurred if for each of the distinct personality who will give the waiver. And titling could be complicated and more expensive
May be on this basis, another proponent backed out, because of the financial size of titling and its complexity
This post suggested that the problem be tossed back to the land owner since the responsibility for the titling belongs to the land owner.
Lately there are suggestions that in order to proceed with the titling: documents, approved plan be ante dated (That means faking some documents)
As I have said let that risk be shouldered by the land owner
Would you agree to faking documents just to get approval?
